If the so-called pairs of opposites are as the two ends of one piece of string, then …
Then, why isn’t psychology easier to understand? Why do we make it seem complex?
Perhaps, Jung’s concept of Shadow is only dense light. He must have been aware of that. There can be no light that can’t be less light, or more. Or shadow that can’t be less or more.
It may be Jung’s followers, or some of them, who try to mystify it all. If so, then why? For money? Or is it due to shallow or sloppy thinking?
The simple seeker in me seems to need to question anything that isn’t easy to understand.
Published by jeanw5
A Journal of a journey, with Spirit as my guide, using
the wisdom of I Ching, an ancient explanation of change as a necessary part of life, to understand Life, and where, how, and why my life has developed as it has, and where do I go from here, and how, and why.
My mission, purpose, or desire is to share my struggle toward and passion for enlightenment, without having a clear idea of what it will look like when I find it, and I intend to find it, sooner or later.
Meanwhile I seem to be struggling toward enlightenment without a clear road map, unless Spirit, my constant companion (did He invite himself along, for laughs, perhaps?) is hiding it from me, for whatever reason.
Vancouver, BC Canada is the only place I care to live, in this world. Perhaps it's not entirely by choice. My name is carved into a nearby sidewalk, as if to remind me where I belong. I am blessed to have Spirit as a teacher. Just ask him.
View more posts
Simple Seekers 